A Human-Robot Dance

by ,

A Human-Robot Dance

Miss Cellania

Many TED Chat movies are cooperation, but this really is really a dance performance, a pas de deux between choreographer and dancer Huang Yi along with the industrial robot KUKA, he programmed.      

(YouTube connection)

When the robot apocalypse happens, KUKA will be the one to assure us that it is all for the best. She may even bring together a cellist -or a robot that plays cello. -via Digg

Robot, Dance, Huang Yi

Like this? Please discuss & link

Start New Comment Crew…

We hope you enjoy what you see! Please discuss:

Robot takeover?

by ,

Wittenberg is the Italian town where Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the church doorway 500 decades ago and started the Protestant Reformation. To mark the anniversary, the native Protestant governments have set up a robot called BlessU-2 to deliver blessings from five languages.

Read More

For the Love of Machines

by ,

Return in time, farther…a little more…there! Back to the very first time you saw something working like a trip hammer or ticking like a clock with cryptic inner workings. If you are reading this magazine, then you likely had a moment at which you began to adore machines for the interest of it. Was it a nail gun or lawnmower, airplane, or train? Cease and recall.

Later, you understood that some machines provide freedom from parents and accessibility to faraway lakes and lakes. And girls, possibly. There’s not any memory without emotion and no emotion with no sounds, sights, and smells. So when you are parked in the lake this weekend, are you remembering the car that got you there the very first time?

I am in my 20th year with HOT ROD along with Car Craft magazines. Sadly, time puts the initial emotion of cars far away. The Chevy Volt I am driving everyday is really a leaden utensil that I can’t enjoy because of its nature as much as because of its comfort and capability to keep me off the side of the street. Most times, the rowdy Bronco with rust and FloMos sits at the garage.

Before you fret, there has been a fresh infusion of new new car men in the HOT ROD masthead which has reminded me of what this was about. Cars. Quick ones, ugly ones, pretty ones, and also pointless ones. We started a car show called Garage Night to remind ourselves why we drink barley pops at the garage Fridays and in general make poor decisions which involve cars. Check it out on our Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram feed and join us. Extended live Craigslist, the toolbox, and HOT ROD Magazine.

The post For Your Love of Machines appeared first on Hot Rod Network.

MI gets new voting Machines.

by ,

When you head to the polls in a couple of weeks you might be using some brand new election equipment.

The country has installed brand new polling machines all over the state. The machinesthat can be state of the art from both accessibility and security, were bought using funding offered by the national government more than a decade ago. The funding came following the infamous Florida election recount in 2000 which result in George Bush’s victory of Al Gore.

Secretary of State Ruth Johnson explained while many states spent their financing straight away, Michigan’s lawmakers decided to wait and conserve their $30 million.

Now the time has come as the recent machines are well past the expiration date.

“They were able to come up with the additional $10 million without any charge increases, without any taxes. That at this stage the money was there. We just saved it for a lengthy time,” Johnson explained.

She stated the voting machines also include an extra safety feature in the shape of paper ballots instead of card stock.

“One of the reasons is that we now have paper ballots, not everybody does. So if there’s ever a concern it is possible to go back and examine these paper ballots and assess them. We could re arrange them with machines with folks looking at them anyway we need,” Johnson explained.

Michigan State Elections Director Sally Williams reported the new machines tested well with early voters and passed several national regulations.

“it is a wonderful way to start. It’s a fantastic time to begin and it’ll be a fantastic test. And we will learn several things, however, we had a few counties go in August and it went very smoothly. So we are hoping for the identical item in November,” Johnson explained.

The new machines will soon be seen in more than 60 counties beginning next August.

Robots & Us: After Machines Take the Wheel

by ,

Autonomous driving technologies could make getting around safer, more efficient, and less expensive. What does it mean to the huge numbers of men and women who drive for a dwelling and is it truly prepared for the road?

Read More

How Can Machines Learn?

by ,

How can all of the algorithms around us learn to do their jobs? Figure out in CGP Grey’s Most Up-to-date video! [CGP Grey]

Read More

Robot nosio olimpijsku baklju

by ,

Sandro Vrbanusponedjeljak, 18. prosinca 2017. Un 17:00

U Južnoj Koreji će, u gradu Pyeongchangu, u veljači sljedeće godine biti održane Zimske olimpijske igre. Kako je običaj, baklja kojom će se upaliti olimpijski plamen na otvaranju prije same ceremonije putuje zemljom, pa je ovih dana stigla I do grada Daejeona. Tamo ju je dočekao — po prvi puta u povijesti — I jedan robot.

Robot Hubo izrađen je na Korejskom institutu za znanost i tehnologiju (KAIST). Ovom prilikom dočekao je trkača s olimpijskom bakljom, preuzeo istu, pozirao za medije, te potom prevalio kratki place s njom. Prije nego je baklju predao sljedećem nosiocu, profesoru koji je zadužen za njegov razvoj, Hubo je izveo i kratki performans. Probušio je, naime, rupu un zidu (što mi je inače jedna od zadaća un redovnom poslu), te kroz nju progurao baklju.

No, tu ovom spektaklu nije bio kraj, jer je sljedeći nositelj olimpijske baklje bio još jedan stroj — “hodač” FX-2, koji izgleda kao dva metra visoki robot u kojem sjedi čovjek i upravlja njime. Ovim događajem najavljene su sljedeće Zimske olimpijske igre kao tehnološki najnapredniji takav događaj do sada.

Na ZOI un Južnoj Koreji će, naime, čak 85 robota biti “zaposleno” na raznim mjestima, a zadatak će im biti pomagati posjetiteljima un snalaženju, pokazivati im place, te ih pozdravljati na velikom broju svjetskih jezika.

Teaching Machines To Educate Themselves​​

by ,

Are you bored of telling machines exactly what to do and what to not do? It is a sizable portion of everyday people’s days — operating dishwashers, smart phones and cars. It is a much larger portion of life for investigators like me, working on artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Much of this is even more dull than forcing or talking to a digital helper. The most usual way of teaching computers new abilities — like telling other pictures of dogs out of ones of cats — entails a great deal of human interaction or groundwork. For instance, if a computer resembles a picture of a cat and labels it “dog,” we have to tell it that is incorrect.
But if that gets too tiring and awkward, it’s time to construct computers that may teach themselves and retain what they learn. My research team and I have taken a first step toward that the sort of learning that folks envision the robots of the future will be capable of — learning by observation and experience, as opposed to needing to be directly told every tiny step of what to do. We anticipate future machines are as intelligent as we all are, so they will need to have the ability to learn like we do.
Setting robots free to learn in their own

At the most basic methods of training computers, the system can use just the information it’s been especially educated by engineers and programmers. For example, when researchers want a system to have the ability to classify images into different categories, like telling other cats and dogs, we require some reference pictures of cats and dogs to start with. We show these pictures to the machine, and once it guesses right we provide positive comments, and once it guesses wrong we apply negative comments.

This technique, known as reinforcement learning, uses external responses to teach the system to change its internal workings so as to guess better time. This self-change entails identifying the factors that made the biggest differences from the algorithm’s conclusion, reinforcing precision and deterring incorrect conclusions.

Another tier of progress sets up another computer system to be the supervisor, as opposed to a human. This lets researchers produce several dog-cat classifier machines, each using various features — perhaps some look more closely in colour, but some look more closely in ear or nose contour — and assess how well they work. Each time each machine operates, it seems in a picture, makes a decision on which it sees and checks with the automatic supervisor to acquire feedback.

Alternatively or additionally, we investigators turn off the classifier machines that don’t do as well, and present new modifications to the ones that have done well so far. We repeat this many times, introducing small mutations into consecutive generations of classifier machines, gradually improving their abilities. This is an electronic kind of Darwinian evolution — and it’s why this kind of training is known as a “genetic algorithm” But that requires a great deal of human effort — and telling cats and dogs apart is a very straightforward job for a individual.

Learning like individuals

Our study is currently working toward a shift from a present in which machines learn simple tasks with human supervision, to your future in which they learn complicated processes on their own. This mirrors the development of human intelligence: As infants we had been outfitted with pain receptors that cautioned us about physical harm, and we had an impulse to cry when hungry or in need.

Human infants learn a lot in their own, and learn a lot from direct instruction by parents especially teaching language and specific behaviors. In the process, they know not just how to interpret positive and negative feedback, but the way to tell the difference — on their own. We are not born knowing that the term “good job” signifies something favorable, and that the threat of an “timeout” implies negative consequences. However, now we figure it out — and very quickly. As adults we can set our own objectives and learn to accomplish them completely autonomously; we’re our own instructors.

Figuring out how a maze puzzle

The recent study my team and I have conducted takes a first step in AI systems with neuroplasticity that do not require supervision. A key problem in doing so entails how to receive a personal computer to provide itself comments that is somehow meaningful or powerful.

We did not really understand how to do that — actually, it’s among the things we’re learning about while assessing our results. We use Markov Brains, a form of artificial neural system, as the basis of our study. But instead of designing them directly, we employed the following machine learning procedure, a genetic algorithm, to educate these Markov Brains.
The challenge we place was to fix a maze using four buttons, which proceeded forward, backward, right and left. However, the controls’ functions shifted for each new maze — so the button that meant “ahead” last match could mean “left” or “backward” from the following. To get a individual solving this challenge, the payoff is not just in navigating through the maze but also in figuring out the way the buttons had shifted — in learning.

Evolving a Fantastic solution-finder

In our setup, the Markov Brains that resolved mazes quickest — the ones that learned the controls and proceeded throughout the maze most quickly — endured the genetic selection process. At the start of the process, each algorithm’s activities were pretty much arbitrary. Just as with human players, randomly hitting buttons will probably just rarely undergo the maze — but that strategy will succeed more frequently than doing nothing in any way, or perhaps just pressing the identical button over and over.

If our study had entailed maintaining the buttons and maze structure constant, then the Markov Brains would eventually learn what the buttons meant and how to get through the maze most quickly. They’d immediately hit the correct arrangement of programs, without paying attention to this surroundings. That is not the sort of learning we’re aiming for.

By randomizing the button configurations and the maze arrangement, we force the Markov Brains to pay more focus, pressing on a button and discovering the switch to the scenario — what path that button moved through the maze, and also if that is toward a dead end or a wall or an open pathway. This is much more complex learning, to be certain. However, a Markov Brain that evolved to browse using just one or 2 button configurations could still do well: It could fix at least several mazes quickly — even though it did not fix others in any way. That does not supply the adaptability to the environment that we’re searching for.

The genetic algorithm, that decides which Markov Brains to choose for additional development and which to stop, is the best technique for optimizing response to the surroundings. We told it to pick the Markov Brains that were the most effective total solvers of mazes (instead of those that were blindingly fast on some mazes but completely not able to solve others), choosing generalists over specialists.

Over many generations, this process produces Markov Brains that are particularly observant of the changes that result from pressing a specific button and really good at translating what people mean: “Pressing the button that moves left took me right into a dead end; then I should press on the button that goes directly to escape from there.”

It’s this ability to interpret observations that liberates the cognitive algorithm-Markov Brain system in the external feedback of supervised learning. The Markov Brains are chosen especially for their ability to create internal responses that affects their arrangement in a way that result in pressing the correct button at the right time more frequently. Technically we evolved Markov Brains to have the ability to learn independently.

This is indeed very similar to the way humans learn: We attempt something, look at what happened and use the results to do better another time. All that happens inside our brains, with no necessity for an external guide.

This article was originally printed on The Chat. Read the original article here.

Found Best Interlocking Tiles Online

by ,

Have you ever considered remodeling your home surfaces without the use of professional tradesmen? Perhaps you have already tried to use a DIY approach to renovate the property’s patio or deck surface? If you have, did you opt for interlocking deck tiles? The natural appearance and easy use of these panels open limitless opportunities for the exterior design of a deck. This article will provide information on the advantages of using interlocking decking tiles.

1. Easy To Install

One of the greatest advantages of using interlocking decking tiles is that the tile is easy to install. The tiles do not require any technical knowledge of tiling or skills in tiling and are a do-it-yourself ideal. Unlike wooden deck tiles that require a great deal of experience in traditional tiling techniques, the interlocking decking design ensures evenness and symmetry with the simple locking tabs.

2. Drainage Feature

The interlocking deck tiles present with a drainage feature which is useful to avoid any water pooling on the upper part of the tile. This means that the water is not left on the deck and there is no chance of a person slipping or being injured. The water will quickly enter the gaps between the tiles and flow to drainage sources easily, here http://www.deckingx.co.uk/interlocking-decking-tiles/ you can find more information about deck tiles.

3. Covering Cracked Surfaces

Unlike wooden tiles, the interlocking decking tile is able to cover cracked surfaces with a particular focus on cracked concrete patio surfaces. You will not need to repair the area or complete any maintenance before laying the tiles as they do not require any bonding to the surface. The only exception is when the wearing of the floor is excessive and makes the floor uneven. In these situations, it may be necessary to do resurfacing or leveling before installing the interlocking decking tiles.